Tata Sons at Crossroads: Power Struggles & Future Uncertainty
A year following the passing of Ratan Tata, the renowned businessman responsible for modernizing the Tata Group into a global technological powerhouse, India's top business conglomerate is facing internal disagreements and outside challenges once more. The salt-to-steel empire, valued at $328 billion, faces leadership challenges due to internal conflicts among trustees of Tata Trusts, the majority shareholder of Tata Sons. This turmoil has prompted government intervention to avoid a recurrence of the 2016 feud following the removal of former chairman Cyrus Mistry. The empire includes popular British brands like Jaguar Land Rover and Tetley Tea, as well as handling the assembly of iPhones for Apple in India.
The Mistry Dilemma: Mehli Mistry's Departure Signals Deeper Divides
Less than three years following his appointment as a trustee of the Sir Ratan Tata Trust (SRTT) and the Sir Dorabji Tata Trust (SDTT), Mehli Kersasp Mistry has decided to resign. This decision was made shortly after he was removed from the position due to a rumored disagreement with the current chairman of the Trusts, Noel Tata. On November 4th, Mistry sent a letter declaring his decision to step down from important roles in three significant trusts- the Sir Ratan Tata Trust, the Sir Dorabji Tata Trust, and the Bai Hirabai J.N. Tata Navsari Charitable Institution Trust. In the letter announcing his departure, he referred to his "guiding influence" and mentioned how he was inspired by Ratan N. Tata's principles of ethical leadership, discreet charity, and unwavering honesty.
His departure occurred amid speculation that it symbolizes another turning point in the intricate and lengthy connection between the Tatas and the Mistrys. There are indications that the disagreement between Mehli Mistry and Noel Tata might result in a fresh legal dispute for the conglomerate, resembling the one that ensued after Cyrus Mistry, Mehli's distant relative, was removed in 2016.
Also Read: JioStar Appoints Amit Malhotra as Head of International Business
Ratan Tata received backlash for his choice to oust Cyrus Mistry as the chairman of Tata Sons, leading to scrutiny of Mehli Mistry's close ties to Tata. Legal proceedings brought attention to the business transactions between M Pallonji & Company and different Tata group companies, but no illegal activities were discovered in connection to those dealings. This occasion marks a disagreement between Mehli Mistry and the Tata Group.
Caveat Filed: Mehli Mistry’s Fight to Preserve His Position
Reports suggest that Mistry took precautionary measures by filing a caveat with the Maharashtra Charity Commissioner to prevent any alterations to the Trusts’ membership without his prior approval. Mehli Mistry's term ended at the SRTT and the SDTT on October 28. The chief executive, Siddharth Sharma, suggested extending his trusteeship at both trusts. If approved, Mistry would have become a permanent member and needed only yearly evaluations once he turned 75. However, Noel Tata and the majority of trustees opposed his reappointment.
A New Phase in the Tata-Mistry Saga: Mistry’s Exit and Leadership Shift
Mehli Mistry decided to leave the organization due to prolonged disagreements that would harm Tata Trusts' reputation. His departure sparked debate on power dynamics within Tata Trusts, which own a majority of Tata Sons. Analysts see this as a sign of Noel Tata's growing influence as Chairman. Mehli Mistry, a key figure in the Shapoorji Pallonji Group, played a big role in the legal battle over control of Tata Sons in 2016. The Supreme Court of India ruled in favor of Tata Sons, rejecting the Mistry family's attempt to challenge Cyrus Mistry's removal as Chairman. This decision was a setback for the Mistry family's efforts to regain control of Tata Sons and marked the end of their legal battle to reassert themselves in the Tata Group leadership. This ruling marked a turning point in the ongoing dispute between Tata and Mistry.
Chandrasekaran Steps In
Following Cyrus Mistry's removal, the Tata Trusts quickly appointed N. Chandrasekaran as the new Chairman of Tata Sons in the beginning of 2017. Chandrasekaran, who had served as the CEO of Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), the main company of the Group, was considered a reliable and competent leader to guide the conglomerate through a period of unpredictability.
Also Read: Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail names Pranchal Srivastava as CBO
Chandrasekaran’s Leadership: Pushing Tata Group Toward Technology and Sustainability
Chandrasekaran's approach to leadership highlighted the importance of embracing digital transformation, expanding globally, and taking the lead in technology. The emphasis was placed on utilizing cutting-edge technologies, such as artificial intelligence and sustainability, to stay relevant in a changing global economy.
During his tenure, Tata Group made a stronger push into industries like renewable energy, electric vehicles, and innovative AI solutions.
Chandrasekaran’s Third-Term Debate: Internal Disagreements Delay Renewal
In 2022, his initial period in office concluded, prompting Tata Sons to review the possibility of granting him a second term. Discussions began in early 2026 about extending Chandrasekaran's term as Chairman of Tata Sons for a third time. However, internal disagreements within the Tata family and Tata Trusts have caused a delay in his renewal for a third term. The objection raised by Noel Tata has led to this decision.
Noel Tata Sets Tough Terms for Chandra’s Return
Noel Tata presented Chandrasekaran with four requests in order to secure his rehiring. Tata Sons should not be publicly traded, as per the request of the RBI. Additionally, Chandrasekaran needs to eliminate all debt within the company. It is crucial for him to prevent the company from depleting its funds through risky investments. Lastly, he must address the significant losses incurred from acquiring Air India and Big Basket. Over the last nine years, the company's earnings have almost doubled, and net profits and market value have increased threefold. According to Chandrasekaran's recent annual report, Rs 5.5 trillion has been invested in order to ensure future success.
Ownership and Control Under Scrutiny
Tata Sons, a holding company overseeing various major industries including IT, steel, automobiles, and aviation, is the focal point of the disagreement. The company is primarily owned by Tata Trusts, which is helmed by Noel Tata. Reports suggest that Noel Tata is committed to maintaining the company's private status to protect the Trusts' power and influence.
The Shapoorji Pallonji (SP) Group, a prominent shareholder and influential business entity in India, has found themselves in direct conflict with his position. The close family connections between the SP Group and the Tatas, whose businesses account for about five percent of India's GDP, further escalate the tension between them.
Also Read: Nidhi Chhibber Takes Interim Charge as CEO of NITI Aayog
RBI Pushes for Public Listing of Tata Sons to Ensure Transparency
The Reserve Bank of India is encouraging nonbanking giants such as Tata Sons to go public, believing that transparency and regulation are crucial for protecting the broader economy. SP Group has accepted this directive, describing the decision to go public as a necessary step for improving governance and promoting shareholder value for Tata's investors. The presence of Tata Group's 26 public companies has a significant impact on the Indian economy, putting pressure on the government.
Nirmala Sitharaman Urges Quick Resolution to Tata Sons’ Crisis
Nirmala Sitharaman, the finance minister, along with other officials, have been conducting meetings to push for a quick solution to the crisis, fearing that prolonged internal conflicts could disrupt the financial markets. Experts say that the group's long history of generous charitable donations is being questioned. Analysts caution that if Tata Sons goes public, it may lead to a more profit-oriented environment within the conglomerate, deviating from the original emphasis on giving back to society instilled by its founders.
Uncertainty Ahead: Tata Sons’ Future and Its Impact on India’s Economy
However, reports also address dangers linked to staying undisclosed. Tata Trusts might make an effort to acquire SP Group's share, and the corporation encounters increasing hurdles on the operational front. This includes the tragic incident of an Air India plane crash, which had ties to an airline established and predominantly owned by a Tata entity. Moreover, a cyber assault that disrupted operations at Jaguar Land Rover in August amplified worries regarding security, supervision, and enduring strength within the Tata network. Currently, the future of Tata Sons is unclear, and there is uncertainty surrounding the distribution of power within the $180 billion conglomerate, which could have significant implications for India's economy and industrial sector.